Go and Declare Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 811668702
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Pensacola, FL, USA
- Phone
- 8504506377
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $74,590
- Expenses
- $51,177
- Assets
- $36,694
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RUDY WATERS (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- RUDY WATERS (PRESIDENT)
- PAUL SHIMEK (VICE PRESIDE)
- TAMI WATERS (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Go and declare, inc. Is a religious nonprofit organization focused on the evangelism of christianity and ministering to people in need.
What it reported doing in 2025
Go and declare, inc. Is a religious nonprofit organization focused on the evangelism of christianity and ministering to people in need. In 2025, go and declare, inc. Shared the gospel of jesus christ in eight u.s. States: Florida, Alabama, Louisiana, Georgia, tennesee, Kentucky, Texas, and North Carolina. In april and may of 2025 go and declare, inc sent evangelist rudy waters outside of the us to costa rica for 13 days. He was preaching and teaching in churches and distributing supplies to low-income people in need. Evangelist rudy waters was also sent to nuevo laredo, mexico where he delivered 200 christmas stockings with candy, toys and copies of the gospel, as well as 30 soccer balls to orphans and underpriveleged children. He also delivered food to low income families while there.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 31.4%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.72; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 56.6%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 30% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 93.6% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.