Gnusjka Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
465486085
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2017
Location
Upland, CA, USA
Phone
9099499804
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Youth Development Programs

Reported finances

Expenses
$3,582
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LINDA KNUDTSON (PRESIDENT/TR)

People named in this filing

  • LINDA KNUDTSON (PRESIDENT/TR)
  • ANDREY POPOV (VICE PRESIDE)
  • OLESYA POPOV (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Purpose: formed exclusively for charitable and educational purposes: providing research on best practices and development of social initiatives to deal with issues facing youth in the modern world with the intent of improving education, employability, health, social inclusion, tolerance and civic participation. This is done in conjunction with other NGO's in the form of training seminars for youth workers, youth exchanges and organized volunteer activity

What it reported doing in 2023

Providing research on best practices and development of social initiatives to deal with issues facing youth in the modern world with the intent of improving education, employability, health, social inclusion, tolerance and civic participation.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 35
  • Transparency & Controls: NotEnoughData
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 94.1%; rating input score 94

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 34% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -39.9% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -14.7% per year; rating input score 0; 37th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 94.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 2 of 2 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2014 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.