Glory Haven Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
921071047
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Catawissa, PA, USA
Phone
5704869725
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Home Health Care

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$237,942
Expenses
$229,428
Assets
$8,912
Liabilities
$5,267

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Christian R Dunlap (Board President)
  • Denise Knoebel (Board Vice President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Christine M Smith (Brd Sec; Hs Mgr,Caregvr,Admin Coord): $75,012 total reported compensation
  • Amy L Yemzow (Brd Treas; Staff RN;Nurse Mgr/Super): $60,814 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Providing high-quality, compassionate personal care that is rooted in a faith-based mission to meet the physical, social, and spiritual needs of each resident

What it reported doing in 2025

Provided 24-hour personal care and supportive residential services in a single family-like home setting serving up to three clients at a time. Services included assistance with activities of daily living (bathing, dressing, grooming, mobility, toileting, and eating), ensuring regular medication taking and reminders, meal planning and preparation, housekeeping, laundry, social/recreational activities, and involvement with implementing and providing feedback for individual's medical care plan through communication and coordination with clients' doctors, nurses, and home health agencies - all overseen and coordinated by a full-time staff RN. The program also provided daytime care for two individuals, one who later transitioned into full-time 24-hour residential care. Care was tailored to meet individual needs for short-term, long-term, rehabilitation, and end-of-life hospice care. During the tax year, the program served five unique clients and provided 365 days of residential personal care to clients. The primary objective was to offer a safe, dignified, home-like environment that supports clients' physical, emotional, social, and spiritual well-being, promoting recovery and independence where possible, and providing compassionate care at all phases of need, enabling individuals to remain in a community-based setting rather than more institutional environments.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 85
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 45
  • Sustainability: 23
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 93.8%; rating input score 94
  • Program expense ratio: 97.3%; rating input score 97
  • Fundraising efficiency: $0.39 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 60%; rating input score 60; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3.6%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.04; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.59; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 59.2%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 41.9% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -19% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 93.8% of revenue deployed · 97.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 5 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $75K · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 42 of 43 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 4/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Fund balance restriction sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.