Global Women Asia Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
931405941
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2128890575
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Reported finances

Revenue
$192,008
Expenses
$76,507
Assets
$60,467

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

People named in this filing

  • WENCHI YU (CHAIRPERSON)
  • TIZIANA FIGLIOLIA (TREASURER)
  • TANIA HYDE (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Global women asia inc. Was formed to support the development of women leaders with experience in global affairs involving asia, and thereby promote and strengthen understanding and exchanges between asia and the world. Through the development of these women leaders, the organization aims to support the development of innovative local solutions to global problems affecting the world, ranging from public policy, to business management, to social and public leadership, and enhance people-to-people connections and cross-cultural understanding.

What it reported doing in 2025

The following programs were held throughout the year: a fellowship program to focus on peer-to-peer learning and personal growth of its fellows; local networking and educational programs with locally-hosted programming such as book readings, speakers, and networking; global online programs to provide opportunities for the community to learn from high-profile women leaders.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 83% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 67
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 39.8%; rating input score 40
  • Program expense ratio: 99.9%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 60.2%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.79; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 23.2% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 99.6% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 75.3% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 39.8% of revenue deployed · 99.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $76K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 40/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.