Global Wildlife Resources Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
810532667
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
Bozeman, MT, USA
Phone
4065864624
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Management & Technical Assistance

Reported finances

Revenue
$52,679
Expenses
$56,700
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROBERT WHITEHAIR (President)
  • TOM STENZEL (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • MARK JOHNSON (Executive Dir.)
  • ROBERT WHITEHAIR (President)
  • TOM STENZEL (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Global wildlife resources, inc is dedicated to teaching and advising wildlife professionals working with captive and free-ranging wildlife and animal welfare professionals and professionals handling dogs and other animals for disaster response, humane rescue, spay/neuter programs, and animal shelters. Gwr teaches these professionals and volunteers how to humanely capture and handle domestic, feral, and wild animals with care, honor, and respect.

What it reported doing in 2013

Dr johnson taught wildlife and dog handling courses for students, professionals and volunteers. Gwr courses had participants from across the country. Gwr continued its efforts to create tools for recruitment of professionals and volunteers for wildlife handling jobs/positions.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 16
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 81%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 75.2%; rating input score 75

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -7.6%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 33.9%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -5.6% per year; rating input score 0; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -16.5% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 81% of revenue deployed · 75.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $43K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2010 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.