Global Sisterhood Inc C/o Dr Shellie Hipsky
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 811096528
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Gibsonia, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7247137494
- Rating
- 52
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $76,711
- Expenses
- $73,296
- Assets
- $14,154
- Liabilities
- $56,827
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- VALERIE LERCH (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DR SHELLIE HIPSKY (EXEC. DIRECTOR AND FOUNDER)
- VALERIE LERCH (VICE PRESIDENT)
- STACEY PALMER (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The global sisterhood's primary exempt purpose is to educate while providing resources and networking for women and girls internationally. By forming connections and supporting each other's missions and movements, we will provide sustainable ways for women throughout the world to make their goals and dreams a reality.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provide resources, materials, and teaching opportunities for the advancement of women as leaders and creation of networks.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 62% for direct work, and 38% for grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 15
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 14.7%; rating input score 15
- Program expense ratio: 15.4%; rating input score 15
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.5%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.19; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 4.01; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 53.2%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -36.1% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 48.2% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 14.7% of revenue deployed · 15.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $11K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 15/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 15/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.