Global Seed Planters
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 465586757
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Sandstone, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6124050341
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Development
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $638,713
- Expenses
- $675,425
- Assets
- $264,786
- Liabilities
- $4,107
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DIANE BRASK (PRESIDENT & EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- DIANE BRASK (PRESIDENT & EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $54,334 total reported compensation
- TIFFANY KEARNS (DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS BEG' MARCH): $39,223 total reported compensation
- SARAH MONSON (DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS THRU FEBRUARY): $5,251 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Supportive ministry in countries such as china, india, & uganda. Preaching and teaching the gospel, aiding farming and water initiatives, and serving the needs of women and girls.
What it reported doing in 2025
Story revolution: story revolution offers captivating storytelling training workshops to christian leaders, key leaders, and mission organizations. We also get vital audio resources to people all over the world who prefer to learn by hearing, not reading, through storytelling, we captivate minds and hearts with god's stories.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 76% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.8%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 78.3%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: $16.21 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 80.5%; rating input score 81; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -5.7%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.39; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 14.6%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.3% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.8% of revenue deployed · 78.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 6 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $529K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $54K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 25 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 49/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 56/100.