Global Peace Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 264599860
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Lanham, MD, USA
- Phone
- 3015776876
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Peace and Security
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $11,105,744
- Expenses
- $10,435,413
- Assets
- $778,488
- Liabilities
- $179,186
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JAMES FLYNN (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- TONY T DEVINE (EMPLOYEE): $122,056 total reported compensation
- JEREMY GRAHAM (EMPLOYEE): $116,000 total reported compensation
- DANIEL BESSELL (EMPLOYEE): $112,055 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Founded in 2009, global peace foundation (gpf) works domestically and internationally to promote sustainable peace, social cohesion, and compassionate development. We believe a peaceful future is within our reach, and that our shared values and aspirations as members of the human family are the keys to realizing diversity, peace and prosperity. Gpf's innovative work includes community peacebuilding, violence prevention, and youth empowerment, women's leadership development, education and entrepreneurship, and volunteer service programming.
What it reported doing in 2024
Africa: africa saw comprehensive efforts in youth empowerment, education, women's leadership, and environmental peacebuilding, often through the african renaissance initiative (ari). Over 800 volunteers, 300 expert facilitators, and 120 institutional partners supported ari's 2024 delivery: global peace leadership conference, nairobi, kenya engaged over 200 high level delegates including a high number of youth representatives, including faith leaders, educators, government officials and civil society leaders, as well as ngos from across the region. More than 50 sessions were facilitated including a regional roundtable briefing on preventing violent extremism. 60% of the delegates were youth representatives across the various conference tracks. In kenya, the great places to school program, a research-based rating system, continued to identify schools contributing to holistic child development, with the 3rd annual gala recognizing outstanding educators and schools. The transforming education summit explored integrating ethics and workplace skills into education, supported by the kenya ministry of education and other partners. The million tree growing campaign continued to combat desertification, engaging thousands of volunteers and community members in partnership with key environmental stakeholders. Kenya donated 3,000 tree seedlings in the standard chartered nairobi marathon, contributing to the kenyan government's goal of growing 15 billion trees by 2032. Nigeria focused on peaceful elections, raising awareness through interactive sessions. The hope builders festival empowered youth, nurtured interfaith harmony, and promoted community development, emphasizing skill-building initiatives for economic stability and entrepreneurship. The peaceful coexistence radio campaign continued to reduce identity-based conflict among christian and muslim communities, reaching millions of listeners. Training sessions were held to establish women's cooperative societies for economic empowerment, introducing women from diverse backgrounds to income generation principles. Youth were empowered in entrepreneurial development through a mentorship and training program, engaging 60 participants. Uganda continued to engage over 1,000 educators in transforming education professional development webinars and workshops. It provided skills training and support services for adolescent young mothers to increase their income generation skills. The launch of "waste plus," a youth-driven recycling initiative, was recognized with a social enterprise award, highlighting environmental stewardship. Peace clubs were endorsed by the first lady and ministry of education. Tanzania partnered with the jane goodall institute for tree-planting projects with young volunteers, uplifting their role in preserving natural resources. The vijana na amani 255 (youth and peace) campaign, launched with the un development programme, provided peacebuilding education to youth to counter radicalization. The "mamahodari" initiative supported single mothers with social support and economic empowerment. The countering financing of terrorism project continued to raise awareness within the nonprofit sector about preventing terrorism and financing violent extremism, training over 300 local organizations. Across the continent, gpf continued to organize ubuntu clubs & community dialogues, fostering youth-led service and social cohesion projects in schools and communities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 64% for direct work, and 36% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 81
- Accountability: 72
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 91.6%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: $29.36 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Pass
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Pass
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Pass
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 95.7%; rating input score 96; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 60%; rating input score 60; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.07; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.4%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86% of revenue deployed · 91.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 5 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $9.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $122K · 10 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $117K reported
- Consistency: 35 of 37 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and grants
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 4 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 40/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 55/100.