Global Orphans & Widows
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 471892944
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Greensboro, NC, USA
- Phone
- 3364049020
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $36,982
- Expenses
- $35,287
- Assets
- $6,712
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ZACK GUTHRIE (PRESIDENT EX)
People named in this filing
- ZACK GUTHRIE (PRESIDENT EX)
- ALEXANDER SWEM (BOARD MEMBER)
- BOB YOUNG (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
N matthew 25, jesus commands us to care for those we see in need. We believe the best way to do this is to partner with sponsors who act as kinsman redeemers in their own country. These sponsors understand the needs in their small section of the world and are able to focus on projects that can produce tangible change. Our approach includes targeted micro-grants with a narrow focus and specific start and end dates. Funded programs meet a wide range of needs, including care centers for children, immunizations, salaries for teachers, scholarships for education, and blankets. We take the time to listen to our in-country sponsors who have firsthand knowledge of the community and needs.
What it reported doing in 2022
To care for orphans and those in need by providing assistance, including but not limited to, meeting clothing, shelter, nutritional, medical, and educational needs
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 95% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.7%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 86.6%; rating input score 87
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.6%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.19; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.3% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 25.1% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -32.7% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.7% of revenue deployed · 86.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $31K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2020 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.