Global Missions International
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 463691938
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2013
- Location
- Colton, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5037841737
- Rating
- 48
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Protestant
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $479,341
- Expenses
- $207,208
- Assets
- $902,175
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
People named in this filing
- JOHN CARPENTER (CHAIRMAN)
- LIZ GABRIEL (DIRECTOR)
- DANNY HARROD (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide charitable giving and support to other non-profit organizations.
What it reported doing in 2025
Land was purchased to expand the land owned and designated for the construction of the facility to house seniors composed of 22 individual units in one big facility which will allow interaction between the senior and the children form the school and children's village. This land has available water resources, which is very much needed for the church, school and children's village. Met with multiple architects to plan for the building structure.land was purchased to expand the land owned and designated for the construction of the facility to house seniors composed of 22 individual units in one big facility which will allow interaction between the senior and the children form the school and children's village. This land has available water resources, which is very much needed for the church, school and children's village. Met with multiple architects to plan for the building structure.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 78% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
MIXED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and revenue comfortably covers expenses. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and a relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 46
- Accountability: 0
- Sustainability: 83
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 43.1%; rating input score 43
- Program expense ratio: 99.7%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: $159,780.33 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Claims monitoring procedures: Fail
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 0%; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: Limited
- Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 56.8%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.35; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.4% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 22.1% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 43.1% of revenue deployed · 99.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $162K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 24 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes foreign activity
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 43/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 8 of 8 not reported.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.