Global Media Outreach
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 841720344
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024, Form 990-N 2009
- Location
- Dallas, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9729759444
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $9,748,014
- Expenses
- $9,634,682
- Assets
- $4,649,134
- Liabilities
- $588,945
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JEFFREY GOWLER (PRESIDENT/CEO (PART YEAR))
- JAMIE RADTKE (CEO/PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- MICHELLE DIEDRICH (CHIEF EXPERIENCE OFFICER): $207,768 total reported compensation
- RHONDA YVONNE CARLSON (CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER): $194,798 total reported compensation
- JEFFREY GOWLER (PRESIDENT/CEO (PART YEAR)): $192,385 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.
What it reported doing in 2024
Global media outreach (gmo) conducts its ministry exclusively through the internet, leveraging advanced technologies and a dedicated volunteer network of online missionaries (oms) to reach people in 13 languages worldwide. The ministry operates under a long-term plan called the five-star strategy, adopted to double our historical impact by 2033. This ambitious vision aims for 5 billion gospel presentations, 500 million indicated decisions, 50 million new contacts, and cultivating 5 million new discipleship journeys. Gmo's expenses are directed toward three interdependent program areas: reach, share, and grow. (continued on schedule o) reach: gmo conducts online advertising campaigns on platforms including google, facebook, instagram, and youtube, to engage people worldwide with the gospel. Through diverse ministry brands, we presented the gospel over 354.6 million times in fy2025, marking a significant 37% increase over the previous year. This success contributed to a historic organizational milestone: reaching the three billionth gospel presentation since gmo's founding in 2004, about five encounters with jesus per second for the last 20 years.share: gmo shares messages of gospel-centered hope, leading seekers to biblically rooted and culturally relevant presentations that include the opportunity to make a decision for christ or learn more. In fy2025, 21.2 million individuals indicated decisions for christ. The ministry is increasingly focused on fostering deeper spiritual engagement and discipleship-oriented follow-ups, rather than emphasizing simple click rates.grow: gmo provides resources and guidance through oms, supporting spiritual growth via websites, social media, and email. We engaged with over 2.8 million new contacts who sought deeper guidance and mentorship, a 20% increase over last year. To enhance discipleship and volunteer capacity, gmo launched a new mobile app version of its proprietary platform (path), empowering oms to share jesus from anywhere, anytime. Furthermore, we implemented messaging assistance tools within path to help oms connect with seekers faster and deliver biblical resources more efficiently and personally. Recruiting ad campaigns and volunteer screening improvements supported a significant expansion of our om force, with recruits growing by 80% across all 13 languages combined. Specific outreach initiatives included highly effective targeted campaigns, such as a gen z ad campaign viewed over 959,000 times, and easter digital campaigns that presented the gospel over 35 million times.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 66
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.4%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 80.1%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.95 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: 87.9%; rating input score 88; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.2%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.48; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 18.1%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.4% of revenue deployed · 80.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $208K · 16 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $513K reported
- Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 34/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 54/100.