Global Green Development Alliance
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 841774657
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2025
- Location
- Foster City, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6505209408
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $44,299
- Expenses
- $43,163
- Assets
- $72,952
- Liabilities
- $61,537
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- XIAOFENG ZHANG (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- PENG FANG (CHAIRMAN)
- XIAOFENG ZHANG (PRESIDENT)
- PAUL MCENTIRE (CFO)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the alliance is to promote the exchange of knowledge, ideas, and experience in clean energy, healthcare, high-impact collaborative initiatives, and green sustainable development projects. Organize multinational clean energy and healthcare related conferences, summits, forums and workshops. Engage projects related to green sustainable development for global climate action, clean energy and healthcare, including smart grid, smart city, smart village, green transportation, and sustainable town development. Leadership development programs for youth, volunteering & internship programs, as well as educational and cultural exchanges.
What it reported doing in 2025
Bring world-class leaders together to facilitate exchanges of ideas and to nurture next-generation leaders.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 70% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 96
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 94.8%; rating input score 95
- Program expense ratio: 97.1%; rating input score 97
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.6%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.69; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.84; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 19.7%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -66.1% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -71.5% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 94.8% of revenue deployed · 97.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $42K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
- Review — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization could not be resolved against the register, so the check is unfinished.