Global Foundation for Humanity
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 141771766
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2011, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Monroe, NY, USA
- Phone
- 8457814395
- Rating
- 94
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $123,740
- Expenses
- $190,227
- Assets
- $259,577
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- JACQUELINE DE CHOLLET (TRUSTEE)
- SOPHIE VERONIS (TRUSTEE)
- PUNEET BATRA (TRUSTEE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To improve the health and education of individuals, primarily women, so they will become more productive members of society.
What it reported doing in 2024
Veerni's mission is to educate and empower adolescent girls from the desert areas around jodhpur so they can lead healthy and productive lives free from poverty, coercion and disease.to this end veerni provides high quality secondary education in a safe and supportive environment.veerni believes that there can be no true democracy without the full participation of women in their communities, and that education is the most effective intervention to this end.in the last 20 years that veerni has been active in the desert villages of western rajasthan, the project has moved from public health into the secondary education of girls and their well being; covering health and nutrition as well as preparing them for a life where they can exercise their human rights. Secondary education is rarely available for village girls.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 96
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 88.3%; rating input score 88
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -53.7%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.36; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.4% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 88.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $168K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.