Global Faith in Action Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 272019720
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2021
- Location
- Wichita, KS, USA
- Phone
- 3162690635
- Rating
- 95
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Relief
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $116,599
- Expenses
- $107,785
- Assets
- $25,846
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SAMUEL MUYSKENS (PRESIDENT)
- MICHAEL DAVIS (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- SAMUEL MUYSKENS (PRESIDENT)
- MICHAEL DAVIS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JONATHAN FLESHER (AT LARGE BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To assist families, congregations, communities, and nations live beyond differences, in respectful presence of all through dialogue in action. To help people of differing religious ideologies and faith practices focus on commonly held beliefs that are transformative and life-changing.
What it reported doing in 2021
The beyond tolerance movement in wichita has reached out to potential cities in Michigan, Nebraska, and Kansas. Former wichita mayor jeff longwell remains our honorary chairperson. The movement's mission is to transform communities by respecting all colors of humanity through truth, justice, and relationships. Successful beyond tolerance projects include: (1) decoration of trees at schools, city hall, homes, and businesses. (2) city-wide rallies and luncheons that introduce the movement to the wichita community. (3) two dialogue dinners. One taking place in homes and one in a gymnasium. There were over 100 participants at each dinner dialogue.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.6%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.24; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.7% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $124K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2013 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.