Global Development Network Inc C/o L Saikrishnan
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 542034142
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Arlington, VA, USA
- Phone
- 2028614364
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Research Institutes and Public Policy Analysis
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $930,244
- Expenses
- $732,610
- Assets
- $470,517
- Liabilities
- $80,079
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JEAN-LOUIS ARCAND (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JEAN-LOUIS ARCAND (PRESIDENT): $141,402 total reported compensation
- NAUSHAD KHAN (HEAD OF FINANCE): $39,276 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Global development network's (gdn) mission is to be a global network that empowers researchers in developing countries, strengthens research skills, and mobilizes research for public policy.
What it reported doing in 2024
Annual global development conference: the global development conference (gdc) is the flagship event of the global development network, held in a different region and on a different theme each year. It hosts high-level, inclusive, evidence-based debates on current development challenges, with its trademark being that most participants are from low- and middle-income countries (lmics). Gdc 2024 took place from november 26-28, 2024, in suva, fiji, on the theme of 'global synergies: climate resilience strategies for a sustainable tomorrow'. The event drew experts, researchers, and practitioners from around the world to facilitate impactful discussions on advancing climate resilience. The conference was organized by gdn in partnership with the university of the south pacific (usp) and the government of fiji. It was sponsored by agence franaise de dveloppement (afd), the international development research centre (idrc), the asian development bank (adb), the sasakawa peace foundation (spf), and the un capital development fund (uncdf). A defining feature of this edition was its bottom-up approach to shaping the agenda, which combined inputs from a conference advisory board and an open call for ideas to ensure discussions were relevant to real-world challenges.this hybrid conference brought together about 700 delegates from nearly 100 nationalities. Over 200 attended in person, while around 500 joined online. The event upheld its trademark of strong global south representation, with 87% of all delegates from low- and middle-income countries (lmics). It also achieved gender parity, with 50% of delegates being women, and ensured strong regional presence with 50% of all delegates being pacific-based. Over the three days, the program featured six plenary sessions, ten skill-building workshops, five parallel sessions, and three keynotes. The sessions tackled challenges and opportunities in bridging policy, research, and implementation, with key takeaways emphasizing the importance of integrating indigenous knowledge into climate strategies, fostering multidisciplinary research, and ensuring equitable climate finance mechanisms. The new, action-oriented format moved beyond abstract discussions to equip participants with practical tools and skills for community engagement and effective research communication.gdc 2024 also hosted several contests/competitions to celebrate and support innovative work in the field: the climate photo essay contest, in partnership with wwf-pacific, showcased the impacts of climate change through visual storytelling.the climate opinion essay contest, in cooperation with the sasakawa peace foundation, invited students to share insights on climate challenges and solutions.the globaldev article contest invited researchers to submit blog posts on climate resilience strategies for a chance to attend the conference.the event concluded with a closing ceremony where the hon. Biman prasad, deputy prime minister of fiji, announced fiji's inclusion in the gdn international assembly membership.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 62% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 81
- Accountability: 86
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.7%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 99.9%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Pass
- Conducts field audits: Pass
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Pass
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 21.2%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.64; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.8%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -31% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -34.9% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -29.4% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78.7% of revenue deployed · 99.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $732K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $141K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 23 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 4 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 59/100.