Global Commission Partners

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
270259331
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Clermont, FL, USA
Phone
352-243-2030
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Foundations
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,831,222
Expenses
$1,877,185
Assets
$753,340
Liabilities
$17,804

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • AXEL LANAUSSE (CEO/CHAIRM O)

Highest reported compensation

  • AXEL LANAUSSE (CEO/CHAIRM O): $110,694 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

By taking the Gospel to unreached people groups through native missionaries, we seek to finish the task the Lord entrusted to us.

What it reported doing in 2025

In 2025 gcp assisted more then 650 missionaries in various countries such as india, nepal, pakistan, buthan, ukraine, iraq, republic of Georgia, egypt, tanzania, bangladesh, andaman island, nigeria, nicobar island, china, ethiopia, niger, eritrea, francophone africa, morrocco, tibet, myanmar, uzbekistan, kazakhstan, turkey and tunisia. In 2025, gcp also provided support for more than 296 children in india, bangladesh, pakistan and myanmar. In 2025, gcp continued to equip missionaries with valuable ministry resources, including more than 100,000 bibles distributed in ukraine, india, pakistan, ethiopia, and niger; audio bibles provided in india; and more than 4,000 copies of the gospel of john distributed in the republic of Georgia. We also supported the translation of the old testament into the kurdish sorani language. In addition, we assisted a ministry in jordan with a summer youth camp and provided support for many refugees living in the country. We also provided blankets, children's clothing, school supplies, cooking items for persecuted christians and mosquito nets in india and pakistan. In addition, we purchased 27 motorcycles, 200 bicycles, and more than 58 sewing machines for ministry and community assistance projects in india and pakistan; one vehicle for a missionary in myanmar; and funded the costruction of 102 wells in india and pakistan. We also supplied various other items, including steel beds, lanterns, children's clothing, floor mats, flash drives containing the complete bible, latrines, and other essential resources. Gcp completed the construction of a boys' rescue center in myanmar and provided a fence and furnishings for the facility. We also built additional bathrooms at the orphanage we previously constructed in bangladesh. In west bengal, india, we supported more than 10 medical clinics on a weekly basis and funded the construction of a church building for one of the many house churches we support in the region. In addition, we provided wheelchairs and other necessities to eight families with children with disabilities in pakistan and india. We have continued helping families escape debt bondage in pakistan. Debt bondage remains one of the fastest growing and most devatating forms of modern slavery in south asia. In pakistan, more than two million people are trapped in this cycle, often passing the burden from one generation to the next. Through the support of our donors, gcp has offered hope and a new beginning, both physically and spiritually. In 2025, 68 families were freed from debt bondage in pakistan's brick kilns and provided with microbusinesses (fruit and vegetable carts), enabiling them to become self-sufficient and never return to slavery. Finally, we assisted many families through food distribution programs in pakistan, india, nigeria, ukraine, niger, and among refugee communities in jordan. More than 2,800 food packages were distributed in 2025. Each package provded enough food to supply at least one family with meals for approximately 15 days.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 70
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Accountability: 74
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79%; rating input score 79
  • Program expense ratio: 77.1%; rating input score 77
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Fail
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Fail
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.6%; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.5%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.4; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.9%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 23 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 79% of revenue deployed · 77.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $111K · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 8 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 48/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 52/100.