Global Care of New York Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 710958356
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Hollis, NY, USA
- Phone
- 7187762200
- Rating
- 49
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health Support Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $171,804
- Expenses
- $319,135
- Assets
- $361,087
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SONNY OKORIE (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- VICTOR ALKUELE (MEMBER)
- COSMOS ANYANWU (TREASURER)
- FRANCIS ELOI (SECREATARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Providing nbsp; quality nbsp; home nbsp; health nbsp; care nbsp; services nbsp; vocational nbsp;/education nbsp; training nbsp; senior nbsp; citizens nbsp; services nbsp; HIV/aides nbsp; and nbsp; housing nbsp; to nbsp; improve nbsp; and nbsp; dignify nbsp; peoples nbsp; live
What it reported doing in 2024
Provision of home help nursing aides
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and a relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 40
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 0
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 54.1%; rating input score 54
- Program expense ratio: 29.1%; rating input score 29
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: Limited
- Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -85.8%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.13; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -11.2% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -11.6% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 54.1% of revenue deployed · 29.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $319K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 29/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.