Global Brightlight Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
452496331
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2018
Forms available
Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2018
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2023501915
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Relief

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$167,043
Expenses
$207,593
Assets
$27,153
Liabilities
$1,391

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BENJAMIN BUNKER (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

People named in this filing

  • JOE HALE (DIRECTOR)
  • DAVID SHANE (DIRECTOR)
  • JEANNE REISINGER (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The global brightlight foundation provides access to affordable, practical solar energy solutions to those who need it most.

What it reported doing in 2018

The global brightlight foundation has one major program, lanterns, which can be broken into three areas of focus. 1. Relief of the poor and distressed or of the underprivileged: indigent individuals who rely on kerosene or other fuels for indoor lighting are uniquely restricted in their opportunities for income production and economic development. As an initial matter, kerosene lamps and other open-flame lighting techniques offer poor illumination and therefore do not provide sufficient or dependable lighting for artisans, merchants, and many other independent proprietors and small business owners who require artificial lighting to continue their income-generating activities after the sun sets. The pv units will provide better and more predictable lighting to support such individuals' economic activities that are vital to provide for their basic needs. In addition, much time and travel often is required to obtain kerosene and other lighting fuel, which reduces the time available for income-producing activity. Again, by providing the pv units, instructing individuals in their use of the pv units, and constantly improving the features of the pv units, the foundation will assist in the reduction or elimination of these drags on economic production, thereby contributing to the relief of poverty among the most needy. 2. Advancement of education: kerosene lamps and other open-flame lighting techniques, which are often used by the indigent in developing countries around the world, are dim and therefore hinder studying by young people. By offering a more reliable and more effective source of indoor lighting, the foundation will contribute to higher levels of literacy and other educational attainment by children and youth in the developing world. Moreover, as indicated above, children in homes using the pv units no longer will be required to devote significant time--often hours each day--to assisting their families in procuring kerosene or other fuel for indoor illumination, thereby enhancing school attendance rates and increasing the time available for study at home. In this manner, the foundation will promote the educational advancement of children and youth in developing countries. 3. Promotion of public health: the use of kerosene lamps indoors can create grave health risks on several fronts. First, burning kerosene releases nitrogen dioxide and carbon monoxide, and impure fuel can release additional pollutants such as extra soot. Additionally, the flames and hot surfaces created by burning kerosene create a risk of burns, and if any flammable vapors are present indoors, the open flame generates a serious risk of explosion. Even trace amounts of gasoline, when mixed with kerosene, can create a risk of explosion. By eliminating the use of open-flame kerosene lamps for indoor illumination through the use of the pv units, the foundation will contribute to the reduction or elimination of many adverse public health conditions in homes and villages, including respiratory problems and the risk of fire, burns, and explosion. Additionally, a reduction in the use of carbon-emitting kerosene in favor of renewable solar power will contribute to a more sustainable environment. By promoting health in this manner, the foundation will be advancing a purpose long recognized by the service as charitable.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 48% for direct work, and 52% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 12
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 93.1%; rating input score 93
  • Program expense ratio: 74.9%; rating input score 75

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -24.3%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.13; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 39%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -19.8% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -22.5% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 93.1% of revenue deployed · 74.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $155K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.