Global Action Platform

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
208691236
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2012
Location
Nashville, TN, USA
Phone
8773005806
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Foundations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$989,449
Expenses
$1,067,651
Assets
$685,531
Liabilities
$1,468,175

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DR SCOTT T MASSEY (CHAIRMAN & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • DR SCOTT T MASSEY (CHAIRMAN & CEO): $211,982 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Global action platform, formerly cumberland center, is a nonprofit university-business alliance advancing scalable, sustainable solutions for abundant food, health and prosperity. The organization seeks to transform innovation into prosperity through the growth of regional innovation hubs by: - advancing a social leadership movement; - investing in innovation and new businesses; - deploying on-line work groups, partnerships, and global communications to accelerate action; and - focusing on the intersection of food, health and prosperity

What it reported doing in 2024

Specific program initiatives include: convene: the annual global action summit, forums at the world bank, national press club and meridian international center; challenge: multi-million dollar impact investments and awards; connect: online services, a global summit fellows program for young leaders; communicate: publications and annual reports, content sharing with the g8, g20, apec, and bric summits, and a global corporate award program for shared value.the global action platform (gap) is an open, nonpartisan collaborative platform to convene leaders, make investments, align collaborations, and share ideas and strategies through global communications to create sustainable abundance in food, health, and prosperity. The platform aims to identify and invest in sustainable, scalable innovations that offer the promise of transformative impact in the intersection of food, health, and prosperity. With input from an international steering committee and national expert advisors, gap was designed in 2013 around four program activities: convene, challenge, connect, and communicate. These integrated programs facilitate action through dynamic leadership events, investments, ongoing working groups, and global communications. In 2014, a five-year roadmap was initiated to inform decision-making among cross-sector leaders and scientists.additional programs furthering the overall mission include: harvard young american leaders program (yalp) - in partnership with the harvard business school, gap directs a local leadership development program in civic and economic strategy and cross sector collaboration. Through yalp, gap selects and sends an annual class of key leaders in the business, government, university, investment, and nonprofit sectors for the weeklong executive education program at harvard business school. In addition, gap facilitates collaboration on projects created by these leaders and an alumni network for the region.healthier757 - gap serves as the collective impact backbone organization and trusted convener of a regional health equity and literacy initiative in the ten county hampton roads region of Virginia. The initiative has created a shared agenda and metrics to engage 8 major community based organizations to improve the health of an initial 10,000 of the most underserved citizens of the region.the caraga project - gap serves as the global non-government organization strategic partner for indigi, an international development company in singapore, with a focus on supporting leadership development, education, and training to enable the indigenous people of the philippines to create a sustainable market economy using the one trillion dollars in natural assets in over one million acres of ancestral lands under their control.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 98
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 68
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 94.1%; rating input score 94
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4,077.49 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -7.9%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.64; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.14; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 19.9%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -1.7% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.4% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.6% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 94.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $212K · 5 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $374K reported
  • Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.