Glenns Ferry Health Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 820372009
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Mountain Home, ID, USA
- Phone
- 2085873988
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Ambulatory Health Center, Community Clinic
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $12,401,875
- Expenses
- $10,742,929
- Assets
- $24,756,254
- Liabilities
- $4,197,714
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- AMBER JORDAN (COO & INTERIM CEO)
- MARY FERGUSON (FORMER CEO)
- TERRY GEIS (PRESIDENT)
- DARLA RHODES (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- KATHERINE GRAY MD (PHYSICIAN & CCO): $502,250 total reported compensation
- SAAD HIJAZI MD (MEDICAL DIRECTOR): $358,748 total reported compensation
- BRENT GOLDTHORPE DMD (DENTAL DIRECTOR): $226,818 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Desert sage health centers provides quality health care to all persons without regard to geographic, economic, or cultural barriers. The health center will continue to address the changing needs of our community by improving and expanding services. With community commitment, the health center will become a dynamic force ensuring a better life for the people we serve.
What it reported doing in 2024
Desert sage health centers provides services to the community's low income, migrant and seasonal farm workers who are served on a sliding fee scale based on the federal poverty levels. During fy25, the health center met the health care needs of over 7,600 patients through the delivery of nearly 37,000 medical, dental and behavioral health visits. Desert sage also serves as a key community partner to the local hospital, emergency medical services, food pantries, diaper bank, and other organizations that serve the community. Our partnerships ensure we are able to meet the needs of our community beyond the walls of our clinic, where most of the need exists.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 70% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 64.1%; rating input score 64
- Program expense ratio: 76%; rating input score 76
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 13.4%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.3; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 21.5%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.6% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 64.1% of revenue deployed · 76% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $502K · 20 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $951K reported
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.