Glendive Medical Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 816016016
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2022
- Location
- Glendive, MT, US
- Phone
- (406) 345-3350
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Hospitals and Related Primary Medical Care Facilities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $53,975,179
- Expenses
- $52,838,607
- Assets
- $49,334,702
- Liabilities
- $24,244,551
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Parker Powell (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Kelly Dinnan MD (General Surgeon): $535,853 total reported compensation
- Jean Basta MD (Orthopedic Surgeon): $460,475 total reported compensation
- Chrystal Potter MD (Director/Chief of Staff): $459,740 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To improve the health of the communities we serve.
What it reported doing in 2024
Glendive Medical Center, Inc. (GMC) is a totally integrated medical center with a 25-bed Critical Access Hospital providing all primary care services to the community of Glendive and the surrounding rural service area. The Medical Center also is comprised of 116 nursing home beds which includes 36 extended care beds and 80 beds with the Eastern Montana Veterans Home, 13-suite Assisted Living Facility, Visiting Nurse Program, and Hospice services. A clinic with Rural Health Clinic designation is attached. GMC is very committed to meeting the needs of the service area they serve. IRS requirements of the community benefit standard for tax-exempt Continued on Schedule O...organizations are integral to GMC's charitable mission of being committed to caring, healing and a healthier community. GMC is governed by an independent board with a representative composition by gender, rural/urban, professional/non-professional and geography. The Board has a history of acting with the highest integrity and proactively adopting governance best practices to ensure the organization operates with the highest of integrity for the benefit of the community they serve. During this year, the Board continued to actively oversee critical functions of the organization. During the past year:1. The annual compliance reports and education was provided to the Board as part of their mandatory education.2. Board members reviewed and signed the required annual conflict of interest statement.GMC makes medical care accessible to the entire area it serves. They operate a 24 hour emergency room, providing care regardless of the ability to pay. GMC had 4,203 emergency room visits during the past year. GMC provides clinical services including onsite providers needed to operate the Emergency Department.In addition, GMC, through its integrated group of providers and visiting specialists, provides non-emergency services to the community it serves. It makes these services accessible to the community through participation in government programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and Veterans Administration and by offering financial assistance in various ways to those who are unable to pay.GMC's Uncompensated Care policy provides discounted and free services to patients who do not have the resources to be fully responsible for the medical care they receive. GMC's policy is structured to provide various options of financial assistance depending upon the patient's needs. The applications and policies for the various financial assistance options and uncompensated care are available on the organization's website, gmc.org. GMC maintains records to identify and monitor the care provided under the uncompensated care policies. During the past year, GMC's costs for charity care, based on the amount of charges foregone, was $322,576 in their service area.GMC through the annual board approved strategic plan strives to meet the community needs. Further information about the services provided by GMC to the community it serves including their annual Community Benefit Report is available on their official website, WWW.gmc.org.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 80
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.4%; rating input score 74
- Program expense ratio: 75.8%; rating input score 76
- Fundraising efficiency: $0.89 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.1%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.93; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.49; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.6%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 10 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 74.4% of revenue deployed · 75.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 8 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $40M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $536K · 19 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.8M reported
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.