Glenbrook Athletic Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 203107236
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Glenview, IL, USA
- Phone
- 8477294626
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $126,594
- Expenses
- $109,212
- Assets
- $170,833
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN KOFOD (President & CEO)
People named in this filing
- JOHN KOFOD (President & CEO)
- NANCY KOFOD (DIR & SECRETARY)
- GEORGE WONG (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to provide a quality volleyball program to children of all ages, teaching them strong fundamental and individual skills in preparation for a competitive high school experience. At all levels, coaches motivate and encourage a commitment towards excellent performance and important life skills used beyond volleyball.
What it reported doing in 2025
Glenbrook Athletic Club2025-2026 statement of program service accomplishmentsThe Club sent two of the club's senior coaches to 2026 The Art of Coaching Volleyball Clinic sponsored by The Great Lakes Region of USAV. Two of the clubs players were invited to attend the National Team Development Program (NTDP) in Phoenix, AZ.The Club traveled with a 17U Boys team to the USAV National Champion Ship Tournament in Phoenix, AZ. finishing in 3rd place.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 91
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.3%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 13.7%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.56; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 44.4%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.2% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.3% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $109K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.