Glenbard West Boosters Club
Legal name: Glenbard West Boosters Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 363944007
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Glen Ellyn, IL, USA
- Phone
- 6304698700
- Rating
- 53
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $84,998
- Expenses
- $154,709
- Assets
- $158,196
- Liabilities
- $96,860
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LISA PATRICK BRENNAN (Vice President)
- ALISON MATT HUNT (President)
People named in this filing
- LISA PATRICK BRENNAN (Vice President)
- TRISTE MARK HEINTZ (Treasurer)
- ALISON MATT HUNT (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Glendbard West Boosters is a fundraising organization with the mission of enriching the student experience at Glenbard West through our Grant process. Joining Boosters is easy. Any West parent, alum, or Glen Ellyn community member can join. Joining Boosters increases the amount of grants we can put back into the school. As a member, you will also have the opportunity to volunteer throughout the year and even chair a committee if you are so inclined. Boosters host monthly meetings during the school year – every third Thursday in the school library. Meetings are a great way to meet other Boosters as well as hear from Principal Peterselli and Assistant Principal Kain. Each join us every meeting to give Boosters a detailed update of what is happening at the school. Meeting dates for the ’25-’26 school year are as follows: August 21.
What it reported doing in 2025
The boosters club gives funds to glenbard west high school to be used for the purchase of equipment, academic programs, club entry fees and other projects for the betterment of the students.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 60% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 47
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 56.1%; rating input score 56
- Program expense ratio: 30.8%; rating input score 31
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -82%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.02; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.61; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -3% per year; rating input score 0; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 56.1% of revenue deployed · 30.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $48K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 31/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.