Glen Rock Junior Football Association
Legal name: Glen Rock Junior Football Association In
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 226063503
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Glen Rock, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 5514047511
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $100,447
- Expenses
- $89,033
- Assets
- $31,570
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JON SCHARF (PRESIDENT)
- BEAU JADROSICH (VICE-PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JON SCHARF (PRESIDENT)
- BEAU JADROSICH (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- MIKE DETURO (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose for which this corporation is formed is to promote and further the playing and enjoying of the game of football among the people, young and old, of the borough of glen rock, county of bergen and state of New Jersey, and the neighboring communities.
What it reported doing in 2025
Our organization provides youth ages 5 through 14 in glen rock, nj the opportunity to participate in organized amateur football. Activities include recruiting players, forming teams by age group, providing volunteer and certified coaches, conducting practices multiple times per week, and hosting games on weekends during the fall season. All activities are designed to promote amateur sports competition and educate participants on teamwork and healthy lifestyles. Our program is funded through affordable participant fees, small fundraisers, donations from small businesses, and individuals.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 77% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.4%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.35; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -4.1% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $105K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.