Glen Alpine Food Pantry Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
872903311
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Glen Alpine, NC, USA
Rating
92
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Food Banks, Pantries

Reported finances

Revenue
$194,139
Expenses
$154,186
Assets
$96,038
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jonathan Terry (Board President volunteer half year)
  • Laura Powell (Board VP then President pantry volunteer)

People named in this filing

  • Jonathan Terry (Board President volunteer half year)
  • Laura Powell (Board VP then President pantry volunteer)
  • Tom Bartholomy (Board Secretary pantry volunteer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Food Bank

What it reported doing in 2024

GAFP provided 318,063 lbs of food to 950 low-income Burke County families in FY 2024-2025 totaling 2,122 individuals 333 seniors 512 children 1,277 adults. This was achieved by distributing 13,877 weekly food boxes at 2-3 service times per week managed by an all-volunteer staff. Program expenses include $138,785 for food + $8,118 supplies and $7,283 for non-food operating expense.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 64
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79.4%; rating input score 79
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 20.6%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.62; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 19.8% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 25.5% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 29.4% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 79.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $154K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 19 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.