Glam-a-thon Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 273265560
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2010
- Location
- Ft Lauderdale, FL, USA
- Phone
- 8134776111
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Breast Cancer
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $46,215
- Expenses
- $77,331
- Assets
- $48,149
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TAMMY GAIL (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- TAMMY GAIL (PRESIDENT)
- JUDITH RUDIN (EXECUTIVE BO)
- TRACI ALLYN SHUR (EXECUTIVE BO)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Glam-a-thon promise: to mobilize our communities by raising awareness of the dreadfull disease known as breast cancer which deeply affects the lives of those diagnosed and their families. Cultivating our philosophy will ensure financial growth which in turn commits to providing support and bringing hope to women, families, our friends and neighbors, during the fight to kiss breast cancer goodbye.
What it reported doing in 2025
Glam-a-thon is a sustainable, dynamic breast cancer charity dedicated to helping our families, friends and neighbors in the communities where we live. We differentiate our efforts with style, sass, and fabulous heels our goal is to take the fear out of breast cancer and mobilize our divas to make a difference. Thousands of supportors will once again make fashionista history while raising funds for local breast cancer patients through our partnership with memorial health foundation.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 98
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 95.8%; rating input score 96
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -67.3%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.62; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.5% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -10.5% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 95.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $74K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.