Glacier Skate Academy Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
474330519
IRS 990 coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Whitefish, MT, USA
Phone
3609516477
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Winter Sports

Reported finances

Revenue
$298,562
Expenses
$236,926
Assets
$267,426
Liabilities
$21,888

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • EMILY HOLT (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • JENNIFER IRWIN (VICE PRES &): $34,300 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary purpose of glacier skate academy inc is to educate youth in the community about ice skating rules, regulations, techniques, and skills while promoting health and fitness and encouraging general sportsmanlike conduct and character development through sport. Glacier skate academy provides a structure for youth to practice and compete in ice skating competitions. In providing skating classes and education to school children at the end of the school day, the organization will directly and indirectly lessen the burdens of government. The organization has provided educational services to inform local youth about rules of ice skating, individual and team strategy, sportsmanship and teamwork and skills and techniques.

What it reported doing in 2025

Past, current, and future activities include the following: 1. On an annual basis, the organization holds learn to skate clinics, group and private lessons to teach members of the community about the rules and regulations of skating and basic skating skills. 2. On an ongoing annual basis, the organization offers individual and group power skating instruction for the purpose of improving stamina, endurance and techniques. 3. During the summer each year, the organization holds a skills camp which consists of warmup and stretching exercises, and instructions on us figure skating assocation (usfsa) skills and abilities. 4. The organization hosts guest skaters to provide education and demonstrations to foster or conduct amateur sports competitions and to support and develop amateur athletes for national or international competition in such sports. The organization organizes local and statewide interteam competitions that promotes and encourages participation in the sport of ice skating. The organization conducts usfsa testing bringing in judges to determine skill level and competition level. The organziation plans and conducts tournaments, and maintains rule and record books. Fundraising: the organization hosts a lemonade stand, runs a skate-a-thon, conducts holiday and summer skating shows and engages in other local and national fundraising activities. All of the above activities are conducted primarily by the directors of the organization and several coaches. Members of the organization assist with fundraising, events planning, and administration support. The majority of these activities take place in a municipal skating rink owned by the city of whitefish, mt. Glacier skate academy's mission is to foster a lifelong love of ice skating and to impact our community with fun, healthy, active, competitive, and affordable programs while motivating each skater, no matter what level or age, to achieve their goals.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 81% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 69
  • Sustainability: 52
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 66.2%; rating input score 66
  • Program expense ratio: 84.3%; rating input score 84
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7.11 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 20.6%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.13; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 14.5%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 16% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 30.6% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 66.2% of revenue deployed · 84.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $200K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $34K · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 29/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.