Givinga Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 474172718
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Wellesley, MA, USA
- Phone
- 3392009064
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $13,144,583
- Expenses
- $12,679,753
- Assets
- $2,917,533
- Liabilities
- $1,959,379
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOSEPH PHOENIX (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR/TREASURER)
- WILLIS O'BRIEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/DIRECTO)
Highest reported compensation
- WILLIS O'BRIEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/DIRECTO): $24,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to empower donors of all sizes through a transparent and accountable public charity platform that provides access to world class giving accounts and promotes active and consistent giving.
What it reported doing in 2024
The givinga foundation fulfills our mission to make philanthropy accessible to everyone in five principal ways: 1. We are an independent 501(3) public charity we receive a substantial percentage of our donations from the public and that support comes from a broad and diverse number of individuals, families and companies. We are not an "affiliated non-profit entity" of a larger financial institution. We don't support a specific community, geography or religious organization. Instead, the givinga foundation is a sponsoring organization built and designed to support the charitable giving activities of all its individual account holders equally. 2. We believe donor advised funds should be accessible to all and we have built a platform that removes high minimums required to open an account, high minimum grant requirements and asset under management fees that promote accumulation versus giving activities to give small and mid-sized philanthropists a platform to organize their giving strategies. We believe that the daf is one of the most efficient and effective giving vehicles in the market today and have created a platform that is accessible to donors of any size. What this means is that anyone can create an account with the givinga foundation and have access to all of the tools necessary to maximize their impact 3. We facilitate amplified giving. Technology has improved many aspects of our daily lives and we believe that it can do the same for giving. Our partnership with givinga, inc. Allows the foundation to provide our account holders with unprecedented access to pools of giving capital as well as the ability to connect with other philanthropists that share their passion. Our campaign platform allows anyone with an account to create a cause-specific campaigns and share with their friends, familyand social networks. Account holders create and giving, inc. Provides reporting, and=ministration and tax receipting. In addition, our account holders have access to multiple pools of additional capital (we call these pools amplifiers) to increase the total impact of the grant.4. We follow an "assets in motion" philosophy the givinga foundation has created a revolutionary sponsoring organization that aligns all parties around granting versus accumulating assets. Donor advised funds provide unprecedented flexibility to account holders and are not subject to excise taxes, payout rules or disclosure requirements. The gf platform has been developed to maximize account holder impact and is structured and priced around active grant making. In partnership with our administrative provider givinga, inc. We have created the first zero fee structure in the united states. We charge no start-up fee, no fees based on assets under management and no fees on account holder assets granted directly to charity. In addition, we adhere to a "breakeven" model of administration, directing all annual excess revenues back in direct support of our account holders.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 90% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 95
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.6%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 97%; rating input score 97
- Fundraising efficiency: $2,018.09 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Claims monitoring procedures: Fail
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 89%; rating input score 89; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.5%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.23; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.67; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.2%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 32.2% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 24.7% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19.4% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93.6% of revenue deployed · 97% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $12.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $24K · 4 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $396K reported
- Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and grants
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 425 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 424 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 8 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.