Giving 365 Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 800502450
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Corona, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9512181417
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $72,861
- Expenses
- $66,782
- Assets
- $7,045
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Dr Kim Kimpel (Founder and CEO)
People named in this filing
- Dr Kim Kimpel (Founder and CEO)
- Susan Goodson (Board Member)
- Dr Dariene Graham-Perez (Board Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide resources, support, and educational opportunities for local families and individuals struggling with poverty and unstable housing to achieve self-sufficiency and reach their full potential.
What it reported doing in 2024
Program Success Summary Youth Mentorship InitiativeFunded by the Riverside Attorney Generals OfficeWith the generous support of the Riverside Attorney Generals Office, we successfully launched and implemented a comprehensive Youth Mentorship Program aimed at keeping at-risk youth off drugs and out of trouble. This initiative provided structured mentorship, positive role models, and access to life skills development for participants aged 1218, particularly those from underserved communities.Key Outcomes: Mentor-Youth Pairings: Successfully matched over 50 youth with trained mentors from diverse professional and community backgrounds.Engagement & Participation: Maintained a consistent 90% attendance rate across weekly mentorship sessions and monthly group workshops.Substance Abuse Prevention: 100% of participating youth completed drug awareness and prevention workshops, with pre- and post-program surveys showing a 60% increase in knowledge and refusal skills related to drug use.Behavioral Impact: Partner school reports indicated a 40% reduction in behavioral referrals among participants, and local law enforcement noted a decrease in curfew and minor drug-related incidents among youth involved in the program.Life Skills & Future Planning: Youth received training in goal setting, conflict resolution, and career planning. Several participants enrolled in extracurricular programs or part-time jobs as a direct result of mentor support.Community Collaboration: We partnered with local schools, faith-based organizations, and youth services to identify candidates and support long-term engagement. Law enforcement officers also participated in Community Talks to build trust and open dialogue between youth and public safety officials.Conclusion: The Mentorship Program has proven to be an effective strategy for deterring youth involvement in drugs and criminal activity. Through positive relationships, consistent guidance, and targeted programming, we are helping young people build brighter, drug-free futures.We are deeply grateful for the funding provided by the Riverside Attorney Generals Office and look forward to expanding the programs reach in the coming year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 65% for direct work, and 35% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 71.5%; rating input score 72
- Program expense ratio: 78%; rating input score 78
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.3%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.11; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.2%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14.5% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.5% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21.9% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 71.5% of revenue deployed · 78% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $52K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.