Give N' Glow Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
934494108
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Wrentham, MA, USA
Phone
5089547353
Rating
57
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Women's Rights

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$853,032
Expenses
$125,870
Assets
$728,579
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SAMANTHA PAIGE ASPRELLI (PRESIDENT/TREASURER/CLERK)

People named in this filing

  • SAMANTHA PAIGE ASPRELLI (PRESIDENT/TREASURER/CLERK)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To empower underprivileged women who deserve to have more than the bare minimum beauty care

What it reported doing in 2024

Distributed 15,645 cosmetics, skincare and haircare products to 2,683 women in need through 43 nonprofit community partners in boston, Massachusetts and around the country. Provided the transformative feelings of confidence, dignity, and joy by collecting high-quality, diverse beauty product donations from beauty brands, social media influencers, and generous individual donors to redirect products to women experiencing homelessness, domestic abuse, recovering from addiction, or enduring other hardship. Distributed products by organizing on-site pop-up shops to bring a shopping experience for women in shelters, workshops about how to use beauty products, makeovers for special occasions, and through means of shipment for organizations far from operations. Ensured women in need had products that made them feel beautiful, resilient, and empowered to remember the importance of self-care in the face of adverse circumstances.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 98% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 42
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Accountability: 64
  • Sustainability: 92
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 14.7%; rating input score 15
  • Program expense ratio: 99.6%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 46.8%; rating input score 47; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 85.2%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.79; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 14.7% of revenue deployed · 99.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 1 of 1 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $125K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 15 of 16 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 15/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 47/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.