Give Back 2 Da Block
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 872203982
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Portsmouth, VA, USA
- Phone
- 757-536-8584
- Rating
- 43
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Delinquency Prevention
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $89,553
- Expenses
- $75,845
- Assets
- $29,191
- Liabilities
- $5,450
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DARRELL REDMOND (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- DARRELL REDMOND (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- SUSAN PILATO (CHAIR)
- JAMIE GAINES (VICE CHAIR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Give Back 2 Da Block works on prevention, intervention, and long-term support by empowering youth through mentorship and economic opportunities and supporting reentry programs for formerly incarcerated individuals. Our Mission To nurture the leaders of tomorrow by offering resources and support that foster health, wellness, and educational achievements. We... Empowering Youth. Transforming Communities. To nurture the leaders of tomorrow by offering resources and support that foster health, wellness, and educational achievements. At Give Back 2 Da Block, we're dedicated to making a profound difference in Portsmouth, Virginia, by supporting the youth and young...
What it reported doing in 2025
Give back 2 da block is dedicated to providing resources and support to youth and young adults in underserved communities, those affected by community violence.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.3%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.38; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.4%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -84.8% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 39.2% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.