Girls on the Run Willamette Valley

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
465289757
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Corvallis, OR, USA
Phone
5417600452
Rating
62
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$18,630
Expenses
$14,520
Assets
$54,269
Liabilities
$147

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

People named in this filing

  • BRECKLIN MILTON (BOARD MEMBER)
  • CALLY DEAL (BOARD MEMBER)
  • HEATHER BRIGHT (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Positive youth development program inspiring girls to be healthy. Provide an after school program for girls 3rd to 8th grade within five counties in Oregon. The program is designed to inspire girls to be joyful, healthy and confident using the physical training for a 5k as a backdrop to learning life lessons. The 10 week program included 20 lessons led by volunteer coaches in the community. In fiscal year 2016, more than 600 girls participated in over 50 teams from schools and organizations located in five counties: benton, lane, linn, polk and marion. More than 165 volunteer coaches were recruited, trained and evaluated in the program.

What it reported doing in 2020

Program served more than 600 girls in after school programming with curriculum to inspire health and confidence.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 50
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 60
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 44.9%; rating input score 45
  • Program expense ratio: 57.6%; rating input score 58

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 22.1%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.74; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 26.4%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -28.4% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -25.5% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 44.9% of revenue deployed · 57.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2014 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 45/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 58/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.