Girls on the Run of North Central West Virginia Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
471358262
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Morgantown, WV, USA
Phone
6813203867
Rating
90
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$114,704
Expenses
$103,796
Assets
$73,194
Liabilities
$230

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOANNA MIZENER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (PAST))
  • DONNA SIMPSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (PAST))
  • ANDREA PATTON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (PAST))

People named in this filing

  • BARBARA DOBILAS (BOARD MEMBER)
  • HEATHER TALLMAN (BOARD MEMBER)
  • MICHELLE LEWIS (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Girls on the run international's main activity is an interactive running program designed to educate girls, ages eight to twelve, for a lifetime of self respect and healthy living. The objective is to reduce the potential display of at-risk behaviors among its participants, with the goal being fewer teen pregnancies, fewer eating disorders, less depression and fewer substance abuse problems.

What it reported doing in 2024

Each girl must choose and conduct a community service project and complete a 1 mile or 3.1 mile running event with their team members. Program results show improved sense of identity, healthier body image, increasingly active lifestyles for the girls that have participated.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 94
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 47
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90.5%; rating input score 90
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9.5%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.71; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 41.7%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -5.5% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 90.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $104K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.