Girls on the Run of Hunterdon Bucks and Warren Counties
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 364598518
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Flemington, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 9087515847
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $88
- Expenses
- $10,221
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
People named in this filing
- CYNTHIA SCHWARZ (Director)
- BARBARA CAVALLA-ROSENBERG (Chairman)
- KELLY CASANOVA (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To inspire girls to be joyful, healthy and confident using a fun, experience-based curriculum which creatively integrates running. Also, to support girl-positive programs that provide girls with experiential learning opportunities designed to empower, enhance, and celebrate the wisdom and strength of every girl.
What it reported doing in 2023
Girls on the run, a program licensed by girls on the run international, and associated after-school programs and 5k events. The 24-lesson girls on the run after-school curriculum combines training for a 5k running event with lessons that inspire girls to become independent thinkers, enhance their problem solving skills and make healthy decisions. All of this is accomplished through an active collaboration with girls and their parents, schools, volunteers, staff and the community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 1
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -11,514.8%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 62.8%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.6% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -14.6% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -14.4% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2019 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.