Girls on the Run of Greater Summit Girls on the Run of Northeast Ohio
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 470991498
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2013
- Location
- Brecksville, OH, USA
- Phone
- 2342060786
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Girls Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $529,530
- Expenses
- $625,069
- Assets
- $604,949
- Liabilities
- $29,134
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Robyn Cutler (Executive Director)
Highest reported compensation
- Robyn Cutler (Executive Director): $78,330 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Girls on the Run of Northeast Ohio inspires girls in grades 3-8 to be joyful, healthy and confident through a research-based program that integrates physical activity with life skills development.
What it reported doing in 2024
Since its founding in 2007, Girls on the Run Northeast Ohio has served more than 21,000 girls across Cuyahoga, Lorain, Medina, Summit, Portage and Lake counties. The organization currently reaches more than 1,600 girls annually through two program sessions per year.Each season is delivered by more than 300 trained volunteer coaches who implement an evidence-based curriculum designed to support the whole girl. Over the course of approximately 20 lessons during an eight-week season, participants engage in a structured program that integrates physical activity with life skills development. Girls build confidence, strengthen relationships and develop essential skills such as managing emotions, resolving conflict, making intentional decisions and supporting others. The program culminates in a celebratory, non-competitive 5K event that reinforces goal-setting, perseverance and a sense of accomplishment. The milestone experience provides girls with a tangible reminder of their growth and the belief that they can achieve hard things.Girls on the Run is more than just a physical activity program, it is a proven model for building confidence, connection and resilience. Independent research demonstrates that participants experience improved emotional well-being, stronger social skills and increased confidence that extends beyond the program into their everyday lives. The organization remains committed to ensuring access for all participants, with 48% of girls receiving financial assistance to reduce barriers to participation. Explanation of Deficit: The organization experienced a temporary operation deficit during the fiscal year primarily due to a leadership transition and strategic staffing decision. This included an unanticipated overlap in executive leadership during the transition of the founding Executive Director, as well as the decision to expand a part-time role into a full-time position to strengthen organizational capacity and support long-term growth. These investments were made intentionally to ensure leadership continuity, maintain program quality and position the organization for future sustainability. The organization is actively implementing strategies to align expenses and strengthen long-term financial sustainability.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 92.2%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 76.7%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.85 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -18%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.97; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.5%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.4% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 92.2% of revenue deployed · 76.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $479K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $78K · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 17/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 52/100.