Girls Incorporated of Bay County
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237393003
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Panama City, FL, USA
- Phone
- 8507696703
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Girls Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $750,663
- Expenses
- $776,968
- Assets
- $463,367
- Liabilities
- $143,448
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TARA WILDER (PRESIDENT)
- CHRISTY MATHIS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MICHELLE DRACOS (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
- CATHERINE GLOVER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- CATHERINE GLOVER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $66,950 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To inspire all girls to be strong, smart and bold.
What it reported doing in 2024
In 2024, **girls inc. Of bay county** continued its mission to inspire all girls to be **strong, smart, and bold** through a combination of academic enrichment, health and wellness initiatives, and life-skills programming. Our organization served as a vital resource for girls across bay county, empowering them to reach their full potential in school, at home, and in the community.**program reach and participation*** **total clients served:** approximately **425 girls** ages 618 participated in our core programs throughout the year.* **after-school and summer programs:** we provided **year-round programming** at our main center and in partner school sites, offering daily academic support, mentoring, and enrichment activities to more than**300 girls** during the school year and an additional **125 participants** in our summer sessions.* **community outreach:** through special events, family engagement nights, and collaborative community programs, we reached an estimated **1,200 individuals**, including parents, caregivers, and community partners.educational and developmental impact**academic enrichment: over 85% of participating girls demonstrated improvement in reading or math performance, as reported by school partners and pre/post assessments.**stem initiatives: girls participated in over 50 hours of stem programming, fostering curiosity and confidence in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.**college and career readiness:** middle and high school participants engaged in leadership and career development workshops, job shadowing, and mentoring sessions designed to prepare them for post-secondary success.health, wellness, and safety** our "strong" programs promoted physical activity, nutrition education, and mental health awareness. More than 200 girls participated in fitness and wellness challenges, while workshops on self-esteem, stress management, and healthy relationships supported emotional resilience.** we collaborated with local healthcare and wellness organizations to provide access to resources and family wellness information.community and leadership development**leadership & advocacy: girls engaged in service-learning projects addressing issues such as bullying prevention, environmental awareness, and community beautification.**mentorship: staff and volunteers provided individualized support to help participants build confidence, set goals, and overcome barriers to success.**non-quantitative/specifically measurable achievements: many participants reported stronger self-esteem, improved social skills, and an increased sense of belonging--qualities that extend beyond statistics but reflect the transformative impact of our mission.publications, events, and outreach* we issued monthly newsletters and ongoing social media updates highlighting program achievements and community impact.* hosted three major awareness events, including the: princess ball, boots n bling and breakfast of champions, along with a 50th year strong, smart & bold alumni luncheon, celebrating girls' achievements and raising awareness of our mission.* partnered with schools, businesses, and local agencies to expand access and visibility of our services.girls inc. Of bay county continues to be a trusted advocate for girls' empowerment and equitable opportunity. The success of our participants--reflected in their academic progress, leadership in schools, and volunteerism-- demonstrates our growing influence in shaping a healthier, more confident generation of young women. Through education, mentoring, and community engagement, we are building pathways for girls to become leaders and changemakers in bay county and beyond.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 61.3%; rating input score 61
- Program expense ratio: 58.9%; rating input score 59
- Fundraising efficiency: $141.61 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.5%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.6; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.31; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.6%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 61.3% of revenue deployed · 58.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $458K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $67K · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 59/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 41/100.