Girls Incorporated of Alameda County
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 941558073
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Oakland, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5103575515
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $9,377,694
- Expenses
- $9,292,790
- Assets
- $28,862,082
- Liabilities
- $678,144
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
28 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JULAYNE VIRGIL (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
- JOY CHEN (PRESIDENT)
- TAMI MUNNS (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
- MARTI POZZI (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
- MARCIA ARGYRIS (3RD VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JULAYNE VIRGIL (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $221,492 total reported compensation
- JERI BOOMGAARDEN (CHIEF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER): $183,410 total reported compensation
- LISA A WANZOR (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $159,940 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Girls incorporated of alameda county (girls inc.) is a local affiliate of the national organization with the shared mission of inspiring all girls to be strong, smart and bold.since 1958, girls inc. Has responded to the unique needs of girls. We offer a continuum of programs focused on areas that are developmentally appropriate and critical for participants to thrive at all stages of childhood. Serving participants from k-12th grade and their families, program services includes literacy intervention, health and wellness, steam (science, technology, engineering, arts, math), life-skills, college and career readiness, and mental health. By incorporating local needs into research-based curricula, girls inc. Has established itself as a lead provider of supplemental education and mental health services.
What it reported doing in 2024
Middle school programsin middle school, girls learn to assert and express themselves, develop their self-image, and begin to define their own morals and values. They also look for connections between classroom learning and the world around them. The middle school years are a challenging time for many girls, as they are developing their identity while facing many negative messages.girls inc. Supports middle school girls' success by providing a wide range of physical and intellectual activities to explore, promoting sustained and increased interest in steam, and giving girls opportunities to build self-confidence as they think about their future. Girls try bike riding and hiking and learn about media messages and reproductive health; engage in hands-on steam projects and connect with female steam professionals; and talk about how to move into a safe and successful future post-high school.core components academic engagement: steam projects, tutoring, college prep, career exploration healthy living: nutrition and cooking, body image, sports and fitness, mindfulness, yoga, reproductive health leadership development: critical thinking, developing voice, problem solving, relationships with peers and adults, positive risk-takingfor the 24-25 school year, the focus of our programs remained the same. Middle school programs include:-all stars (sports, technology, academics, responsibility, sisterhood) (grades 6-8): empowering girls to develop their capabilities through technology, academic enrichment, career exploration, leadership, sisterhood, fitness and team-building activities.-eureka! Teen achievement program (grades 8-12): fostering girls'interest in science, technology, engineering, and math, providing them with valuable summer internship opportunities, and preparing them for college during the school year and during the summer.-- we lead is a leadership curriculum for middle and high school participants that offers a balance of strength-building activities and in-depth discussions on important topics like leadership styles and allyship. Participants learn to embrace their leadership superpowers and reject limiting preconceived notions of what girls can do. The curriculum will also include field trip offerings and health and wellness education.girls resource center (grades 6-12): a downtown oakland hub where girls access innovative and responsive services and programming. Girls are offered opportunities to take positive risk in exploring adventure sports, learn self-defense principles, become the next generation of women recording artists and engineers, learn about nutrition and healthy eating, workout in the fitness center, participate in yoga, develop leadership skills and create change within their community. In addition, girls make new friends, become more confident, find their own voice, and receive academic support and college and career readiness in a positive allgirl space.girls in our middle school programs report increased confidence and interest in steam learning opportunities and career exploration, paving the way to a commitment to learning.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 98
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.4%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 87.6%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $13.43 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 95.7%; rating input score 96; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.9%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.11; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10.4%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.4% of revenue deployed · 87.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 22 of 23 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $8.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $221K · 28 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 47/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.