Girls Inc of Columbus - Endowment Fund
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 586194963
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Columbus, GA, USA
- Phone
- 7066446294
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $612,853
- Expenses
- $167,434
- Assets
- $2,800,617
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
33 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Danita Gibson Lloyd (CEO)
- Gail Burgos (Former CEO)
People named in this filing
- Amanda Barbaree (Trustee)
- Latisha Stephens-Archibald (Trustee)
- Ashley Woitena (Trustee)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Furtherance of the charitable purpose of girls inc. Of columbus, ga under section 501 (c) (3) of the internal revenue code
What it reported doing in 2025
The girls inc. Of columbus ga endowment fund is organized & operated to provide financial assistance to the girls inc. Of columbus ga in furtherance of its charitable purpose.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 68
- Sustainability: 93
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 88.7%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 54.5%; rating input score 55; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 72.7%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 16.73; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 88.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 18 of 33 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $149K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 33 people listed
- Consistency: 13 of 13 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 55/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Board meeting minutes documented not reported.