Girl Scouts of Southern Arizona
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 860098917
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Tucson, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 5203272288
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,611,905
- Expenses
- $5,999,113
- Assets
- $3,496,567
- Liabilities
- $1,338,345
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
24 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KRISTEN HERNANDEZ (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- KRISTEN HERNANDEZ (CEO): $155,116 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Girl scouts develops girls of courage, confidence and character who make the world a better place.
What it reported doing in 2024
Our organization is dedicated to empowering young girls aged 5-17, annually reaching over 5,000 individuals. However, our impact extends beyond mere numbers. While volunteer-led troops remain fundamental to the girl scout movement, we recognized the limitations of this model in addressing the evolving needs of our community. Motivated by the belief that every girl, regardless of socio-economic background or risk status, deserves equal access to opportunity, we integrated a staff-supported troop delivery model. Our dedicated part-time staff members cater to girls facing crises, those in foster care, detention, with an incarcerated female relative, as well as those residing in rural or impoverished areas. Committed to our core pillars of stem, outdoors, life skills, and entrepreneurship, we deliver the girl scout leadership experience through a meticulously crafted curriculum. This curriculum encompasses hundreds of traditional and contemporary skill-building badges and leadership journeys, fostering both 21st-century soft skills-such as empathy, communication, problem-solving, and risk-taking-and concrete skills like coding, jewelry making, and car maintenance. Furthermore, our emphasis on global citizenship remains steadfast. Our highest awards-the bronze, silver, and gold awards-require completion of a take action project. These projects transcend mere service, incorporating elements of measurability, sustainability, and global impact to effect change beyond the confines of a girl's immediate community. At 113 years old, the girl scouting movement and its mission continue to resonate profoundly in today's world. Countless girls and alumnae are thriving, demonstrating leadership in their homes, workplaces, and communities, guided by the enduring values instilled through their girl scouting experiences. Our organization, both locally and nationally, stands robust and resilient, poised to serve our members for generations to come.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Affiliate-supported. 74% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 65% for direct work, and 35% for affiliated organizations.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 82.2%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: $10.31 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.3%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.58; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.38; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.6%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 82.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 23 of 23 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $155K · 24 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 39/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.