Girl Scouts of Eastern Massachusetts Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 042703281
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Waltham, MA, USA
- Phone
- 8443064736
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $18,885,184
- Expenses
- $16,967,701
- Assets
- $32,199,073
- Liabilities
- $1,349,750
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
35 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BARBARA FORTIER (CEO (UNTIL 9/30/24))
- MONICA ROBERTS (CEO (AS OF 11/1/24))
- DEBORAH TAFT (BOARD CHAIR & PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ANNE GARMEY (CHIEF ADVANCEMENT OFFICER): $211,039 total reported compensation
- BARBARA FORTIER (CEO (UNTIL 9/30/24)): $193,095 total reported compensation
- KATHERINE LELACHEUR (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER (UNTIL 9/25)): $188,912 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character, who make the world a better place.
What it reported doing in 2024
Community engagement programming girl scouts of eastern Massachusetts recognizes that in many Massachusetts communities, girls are underserved in the four key areas of the girl scout leadership experience: stem, outdoors, entrepreneurship, and life skills. Girl scout programs can offer a safe, single-gender environment to develop these important areas through activities that are girl scout-led, cooperative, and hands-on. Supported by caring adult staff and volunteers, girl scouts discover themselves and their values, try new things, take healthy risks, connect with others to create positive relationships, and take action in their communities. Gsema is committed to increasing access to girl scout programming in communities where they are the most in need.according to girl scouts of the USA's (gsusa's) 2017 state of girls report, 16% of girls in Massachusetts live in poverty, 33% of Massachusetts girls are being raised in single-parent families, 26% of girls in Massachusetts come from immigrant families, and girls from families with low socioeconomic status are more likely to be of black/african american and hispanic/latina descent. Throughout our council footprint of 178 communities, gsema has identified 13 target communities that demonstrate the most need: boston, bradford, cambridge, chelsea, everett, haverhill, lawrence, lynn, malden, methuen, revere, saugus, and somerville.gsema provides girl scouts in grades k-12 in underserved communities a foundational girl scout experience through targeted community outreach and partnerships with schools, community centers, and housing authorities. Gsema also offers additional support to increase the growth of new troops, and deliver the full girl scout experience primarily through volunteer led girl scout programming. Our community engagement team identifies barriers to participation, provides individualized assistance, and creates community-specific solutions to bring the girl scout leadership experience to those who may not otherwise be introduced to girl scouts.all gsema curricula focuses on the four areas that form the foundation of a girl scout leadership experience: stem, outdoors, life skills and entrepreneurship (includes financial literacy). Curricula is age-appropriate, utilizes gsusa national program portfolio, and whenever possible, is girl scout-led to foster skills such as cooperation, communication, strong work ethic, etc. In addition to the variety of fun and challenging activities girl scouts will experience in the areas of stem, outdoors, life skills and entrepreneurship, girl scouts will also be presented with opportunities to attend gsema signature events such as the annual stem conference; spend the day at one of gsema's camps during our family day at camp; participate in an overnight camp experience with other girl scouts; plan and carry out service projects to better their community and include girl scout traditions in their troops such as ceremonies and celebrating world thinking day. Gsema aims to address and minimize barriers to participating in girl scouts to families and caregivers in the target communities by providing: -assistance with membership and program cost as needed -access to uniforms with financial assistance if needed -a safe, familiar, and accessible community location-background-checked and trained staff and/or volunteers -access to special stem and leadership events, and outdoor programs at girl scout properties with transportation available -opportunities to learn about college and career options, from female mentors in their local communities and professional females in their chosen careers, especially in areas that address the gender gap and stereotypes -options to apply for financial aid to other girl scout experiences such summer camp and travel -family engagement opportunities -translated communications and materials
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 65
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 73%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: $1.76 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.2%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.9; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.3%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 73% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 23 of 23 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $12.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $211K · 35 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $493K reported
- Consistency: 39 of 39 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 5/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 48/100.