Girl of Hope
Legal name: Girl of Hope Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 833131635
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2021
- Official website data refreshed
- Jul 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2021
- Location
- Cleveland, TN, USA
- Phone
- (706) 410-0509
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Support N.E.C.
- Affiliation
- Religious (unspecified)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $37,730
- Expenses
- $39,437
- Assets
- $1,041
- Liabilities
- $8,000
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
People named in this filing
- Jennifer A Jennings (Director)
- Paul Gresham (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
She is also the founder & creator of JUMPOLOGY, a program all about rebounding exercise which builds muscle, burns fat, AND cleanses our crucial lymphatic system, which is the “dumping post” for disease. Along with JUMPOLOGY, she customizes personal fitness & nutrition plans to help others rid themselves of the “inner weights” that are slowing them down from living wild & free, empowering them to experience the dream-come-true life that has always been OURS to enjoy. Getting healthy is NOT as hard as it seems, and Abigail will show you how! No matter how dark or difficult your valley, there is ALWAYS HOPE in any circumstance! Abigail also enjoyed her time as an on-staff counselor at _Bethel.
What it reported doing in 2021
Help people everywhere experience healing, freedome and wholeness in all stages of life but especially in times of crises
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 18
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.5%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.03; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 7.68; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 75%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5.8% per year; rating input score 0; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -49.9% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2019 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.