Gilbert Shooting Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
461636692
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Gilbert, IA, USA
Phone
5152317923
Rating
64
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$576,334
Expenses
$105,977
Assets
$821,844
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHRIS EGGERT (President)
  • ERIC VAN GORP (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • CHRIS EGGERT (President)
  • ERIC VAN GORP (Vice President)
  • MITCH BAUM (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Through a combination of education and athletics, we hope to provide opportunities for growth and personal development to student athletes from elementary school through high school. We provide a supportive environment where team-based clay target sports serve as a catalysts for teaching life lessons and skills while emphasizing positive character traits, citizenship values and sportsmanship.

What it reported doing in 2025

Founded in 2012 the Gilbert Shooting Club is a 501 c3 nonprofit youth sports club providing alternative sporting and educational opportunities to youth, grades 3-12, in the Gilbert School District. Our club is sanctioned by the Iowa Scholastic Clay Target Program (IASCTP) and supported by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources.Through a combination of education and athletics, we hope to provide opportunities for growth and personal development to student athletes from elementary school through high school. We provide a supportive environment where team-based clay target sports serve as a catalysts for teaching life lessons and skills while emphasizing positive character traits, citizenship values and sportsmanship.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 84% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 44
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 58
  • Sustainability: 91
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 18.8%; rating input score 19
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 81.6%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.75; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -58.8% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 72.2% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 80.2% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 18.8% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 0 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $106K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 15 of 16 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 19/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.