Gilbert Hoops Club Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 874104292
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Gilbert, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 4809642408
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Basketball
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $107,745
- Expenses
- $88,455
- Assets
- $26,941
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- JASON E LAKE (CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD)
- JARED SUSINI (TREASURER)
- ADAM BICKERSTAFF (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to promote life skill development of youth through basketball by emphasizing self-improvement, teamwork, and most importantly enjoying the process. We also intend to provide this opportunity regardless of level of income. We can do this through our foundation (gilbert hoops club foundation), an IRS 501(c)(3) tax-exempt public charity. Ghc hopes to change the life path of youth through basketball in hopes that they pay it forward later in life through service and/or charity work.
What it reported doing in 2025
Prepare youth for the next stage of life through sports. Learn concepts of delayed gratification, commitment, teamwork, wining/losing, learning how to be coached in life. Keeping them focused on relationships and physical and mental health and exposure to positive role models.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.1%; rating input score 74
- Program expense ratio: 90.3%; rating input score 90
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.9%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.3; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -20.8% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -10.9% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 33% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 74.1% of revenue deployed · 90.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $80K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.