Gigis House Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 813818377
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Morrow, GA, USA
- Phone
- 4703728050
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,989,029
- Expenses
- $1,089,715
- Assets
- $3,009,533
- Liabilities
- $598,627
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Sandra Richardson (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Sabrina Crawford (Founder Co-Chair)
- Brandy L Hatfield (Treasurer)
- Vanessa Jackson (Board Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide a safe home for teenage girls 19 and under who are victims of sex trafficking. Providing victims supportive service, resources, and restoration. Reducing homelessness, building self-esteem, and independence to ensure they can thrive in the community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Gigis House, through the support of individual donors, constructed and opened a 10 bedroom home in 2018 to provide a safe environment for girls who are victims of sex trafficking. In FY23, we opened our second 10 bedroom home allowing us to service even more teen girls. We are currently in the midst of construction on our new administrative building which will feature a gymnasium, classroom offices, onsite therapy rooms and so much more. We have been able to serve residents that have come to us through both private and state placement. Our residents come from diverse backgrounds and have included girls as young as 12 years old. Gigis house offers so much more than a safe home to each of the girls coming through our program, we provide individual and group trauma informed therapy with a licensed therapist, mentoring, life skills and daily self-confidence building activities. We have seen these girls transform from broken and feeling unloved and not worthy to thriving independent young adults who are ready to conquer the world. As the girls are accepted into the program, we assess their education levels and provide a rich home-schooling environment. Since many of the girls entering the program test well below their grade level, we structure our home schooling to allow them to catch-up to their expected grade level or depending on the individual girls needs, we offer preparation for GED. We have partnered with a public school system to provide GED preparation, which allows the girls to participate in an environment with others outside of the home. Since beginning the program, we have witnessed girls graduate high school, obtain their GED, attend and graduate from certified nursing assistant school and even go off to college. Some of these girls are the first in their families to graduate high school. Through our program the girls have shared many first-time life experiences. Our team is passionate about helping these girls develop practical and emotional life skills so that they can survive as healthy adults and build the futures they all deserve to have. Gigis House is thrilled to have impacted the lives of over 212 teen girls so far and counting.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 60% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 95
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 77
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 50%; rating input score 50
- Program expense ratio: 88.3%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $99.84 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 45.2%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.76; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.2; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 20.1% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 24% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21.9% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 50% of revenue deployed · 88.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $962K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.