Giftmart Family Charities Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
882603097
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2025
Location
Naperville, IL, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Gift Distribution

Reported finances

Revenue
$14,726
Expenses
$19,031
Assets
$9,513

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Katie Minott (President)

People named in this filing

  • Pam Blanchard (Treasurer)
  • Jennifer Schreier (Secretary)
  • Katie Minott (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Giftmart Family Charities is a Christmas shopping event in December to offer families a hand up during the holidays. The event takes place over 2 days one to serve children in Naperville Il school district 203 and the second day to serve children in Naperville Il school district 204. The model creates a shopping event with donated toys and to invite under-resourced families in the community to take part in it. The event invites the families of over 1500 children in both school districts. Our goal is to collect over 4000 toys that the parents would then hand select for their children purchase for $2 each and have wrapped on site. 100% of the parents financial contribution to the purchase goes back to their childs home school to support educational programs and purchases needed by the schools. Giftmart Family Charities does not keep any of the funds from the purchase of these toys. 100% of the money goes back to the schools.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 61% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -29.2%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.5; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 32.6% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 38.9% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.