Gift of Sight Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 824054875
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Weston, FL, USA
- Phone
- 9546542704
- Rating
- 44
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Relief
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $144,547
- Expenses
- $45,224
- Assets
- $102,567
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jay L Reddy (President)
People named in this filing
- Jay L Reddy (President)
- Dr Samir Kulkarni (Treasurer)
- Dr William Duquette (Board Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
1. Our volunteers and paid staff visit schools to conduct initial vision screenings, identifying children who need further evaluation and care. 2. We arrange for ophthalmologists to visit schools and provide professional eye examinations, determining the best treatment plan for each child. 3. We distribute prescription glasses immediately, provide medicines when needed, and fund surgeries for children who require them.
What it reported doing in 2025
In 2025, our organization helped screen over 300,000 school children to identify visual defects. Out of the initial screenings, over forty thousand were selected to be further evaluated by eye care professionals. Of these, nearly 30,000 children were given free prescription glasses. The positive impact on these children who now can see better and read better is immeasurable. It gives them decades of productivity increase boosting their chances in education and economic outlook. Our mission directly improves the prospects for the children, their families, and society.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 86
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 68.7%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.27; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.