Gifft Hill School Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
660567902
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2022
Location
St John, VI, USA
Phone
3407761730
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Secondary, High School

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,571,754
Expenses
$5,092,922
Assets
$9,770,015
Liabilities
$742,540

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RUTH DOAN (PRESIDENT)
  • RICHARD EMMETT (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • J ELIZABETH KINSELLA (HEAD OF SCHOOL): $140,005 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide a quality education to the students of our school.

What it reported doing in 2024

During the reporting period, gifft hill school provided a comprehensive, student-centered education to children from age 2 through grade 12 on st. John, u.s. Virgin islands. The school served students and their families through rigorous academic programming, experiential learning, and a strong commitment to character development, environmental stewardship, and community engagement.academic programs emphasized critical thinking, creativity, and real-world application of knowledge. Students participated in interdisciplinary coursework, project-based learning, and experiential opportunities that connect classroom instruction to the unique cultural and environmental context of the virgin islands. Programs such as farm to table learning, service-based projects, and arts integration supported whole-child development and fostered a sense of responsibility to self, community, and place.beyond measurable academic outcomes, gifft hill school achieved meaningful impact through cultivating caring community leaders, as reflected in student engagement in service learning, environmental conservation efforts, and partnerships with local organizations. Faculty professional development strengthened instructional quality and supported innovative teaching practices, enhancing long-term educational excellence.gifft hill school also served as a community resource by collaborating with local schools, nonprofits, and families, contributing to the social, educational, and environmental well-being of st. John. Through these efforts, the school advanced its mission to educate, inspire, and empower students to become thoughtful, capable, and compassionate leaders prepared to contribute positively to their communities and the wider world.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 68% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 70% for direct work, and 30% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 79
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 85.1%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 74.4%; rating input score 74
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.69 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -11.4%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.92; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.7%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 18.3% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 85.1% of revenue deployed · 74.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $140K · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 20/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.