Gifft Hill School Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 660567902
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2022
- Location
- St John, VI, USA
- Phone
- 3407761730
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Secondary, High School
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,571,754
- Expenses
- $5,092,922
- Assets
- $9,770,015
- Liabilities
- $742,540
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RUTH DOAN (PRESIDENT)
- RICHARD EMMETT (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- J ELIZABETH KINSELLA (HEAD OF SCHOOL): $140,005 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide a quality education to the students of our school.
What it reported doing in 2024
During the reporting period, gifft hill school provided a comprehensive, student-centered education to children from age 2 through grade 12 on st. John, u.s. Virgin islands. The school served students and their families through rigorous academic programming, experiential learning, and a strong commitment to character development, environmental stewardship, and community engagement.academic programs emphasized critical thinking, creativity, and real-world application of knowledge. Students participated in interdisciplinary coursework, project-based learning, and experiential opportunities that connect classroom instruction to the unique cultural and environmental context of the virgin islands. Programs such as farm to table learning, service-based projects, and arts integration supported whole-child development and fostered a sense of responsibility to self, community, and place.beyond measurable academic outcomes, gifft hill school achieved meaningful impact through cultivating caring community leaders, as reflected in student engagement in service learning, environmental conservation efforts, and partnerships with local organizations. Faculty professional development strengthened instructional quality and supported innovative teaching practices, enhancing long-term educational excellence.gifft hill school also served as a community resource by collaborating with local schools, nonprofits, and families, contributing to the social, educational, and environmental well-being of st. John. Through these efforts, the school advanced its mission to educate, inspire, and empower students to become thoughtful, capable, and compassionate leaders prepared to contribute positively to their communities and the wider world.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 68% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 70% for direct work, and 30% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.1%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 74.4%; rating input score 74
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.69 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -11.4%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.92; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.7%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 18.3% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.1% of revenue deployed · 74.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $140K · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 20/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.