Ghs Academy Golden Hills School

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311758772
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
El Dorado Hills, CA, USA
Phone
9169330100
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Primary, Elementary Schools

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,767,569
Expenses
$2,742,588
Assets
$4,653,708
Liabilities
$3,148,983

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • ARMAGHAN MIRHAJ THRU 062025 (HEAD OF SCHOOL): $199,342 total reported compensation
  • NICOLE DEL CARLO (BUSINESS DIRECTOR): $132,547 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Ghs provides an enriched educational environment that fosters a culture of integrity, respect and service to others. With high standards in academics and character development, ghs prepares students to be confident and successful global citizens.

What it reported doing in 2024

Golden hills school is a fully accredited, independent, non-profit school. The school is self-managed and controlled and not part of a corporate chain. We offer a complete academic programs for students in junior-kindergarten through eighth grade. Our philosophy is that the successful education of a child requires an equal partnership between students, their parents and the school. At golden hills school, we are committed to nurturing and developing this partnership to ensure an enriched and superior educational experience for each of our students and for our families.small class sizes, student character development, experienced and caring teachers and parental involvement are the foundations on which golden hills school was established. We believe in meeting and then challenging each student at their own ability-level, providing him or her with the opportunity to progress at his or her own pace. This personalized approach allows each student to maximize their academic, social and physical potential.our academic program focuses on imparting a strong academic foundation, through small group, ability-based learning with differentiated instruction. By ensuring that students acquire academic skills early in their education, they are empowered and capable of becoming partners in their own education and take on the responsibility for their own learning in an age-appropriate manner. Character education is a critical part of who we are as a community. The character development program is guided by our characters of gold which are integrated into everything that is taught to the students.in addition, golden hills school offers an extensive portfolio of enrichment classes enabling us to deliver "a complete education" at a level that is unmatched in the sacramento area. We incorporate physical education daily at all grade levels taught by a full-time physical education instructor. Our students enjoy art, music, dance, drama, spanish, and computer instruction.our athletics program is extensive and very popular. We participate in the county sports program which includes basketball, volleyball, wrestling, football and cross country. Our students have the opportunity to participate in sport clinics including golf and basketball. Extracurricular activities take place on campus in our complete gymnasium with stage for the performing arts and our athletic field. Total students enrolled for the 2024/2025 fiscal year was approximately 142.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 94% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.9%; rating input score 87
  • Program expense ratio: 87.6%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: $6.95 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.9%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.7; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.68; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 12.1%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86.9% of revenue deployed · 87.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $199K · 8 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 26/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.