Gfwc Womens Club of South County Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
050370880
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Wakefield, RI, USA
Phone
4012586741
Rating
58
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Women's Service Clubs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$118,047
Expenses
$103,356
Assets
$193,161
Liabilities
$9,680

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • E MONAHAN L BUTERA NOBLE (PRESIDENT PRESIDENT ELECT)

People named in this filing

  • E MONAHAN L BUTERA NOBLE (PRESIDENT PRESIDENT ELECT)
  • KIM HANSON DEBRA HEGGIE (COMMUNITY FUNDING - CO-LEADERS)
  • S SHOVLIN S WILCOX (COMMUNITY OUTREACH CO-LEADERS)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

See Schedule O

What it reported doing in 2025

Scholarships to local young woment in need enabling them to become self-sufficient through pursuit of a degree or obtaining creditials for practicing a vocation funds are provided with proceeds from book author fundraising and beverage tasting fundraising events

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 19
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 62
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 18.2%; rating input score 18
  • Program expense ratio: 20.7%; rating input score 21

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 12.4%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.87; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13.6% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 23.5% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 18.2% of revenue deployed · 20.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $21K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 18/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 21/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.