Getpaid Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 454169474
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Phone
- 4126902445
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Rehabilitation Services for Offenders
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $211,318
- Expenses
- $338,222
- Assets
- $2,195,504
- Liabilities
- $3,912,755
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DOUGLAS WILLIAMS (CEO)
- PAUL TRUNZO (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
- SCOTT JOHANSON (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- DOUGLAS WILLIAMS (CEO): $350,000 total reported compensation
- PAUL TRUNZO (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT): $287,101 total reported compensation
- SCOTT JOHANSON (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT): $277,486 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Gaining employment through planning, advocacy, initiative, and dedication.
What it reported doing in 2024
Getpaid is a 6-month on the job employment training program for individuals reentering the workforce. It offers employment training and incorporates contemporary best practices in employment reentry services. Pre-employment and employment readiness training help individuals in the criminal justice system prepare for success. Participants will have access to a groundskeeper supervisor who will coach and supervise each participant in areas such as workplace behavior, time management and workplace ethics.the supervisor works closely with each employment training site's staff to ensure all participants successfully reenter the workforce. Currently getpaid partners with pittsburgh downtown partnership to power wash pittsburgh streets and alley ways.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -60.1%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.49; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.78; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 43.9%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -16.8% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -13.2% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $338K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $350K · 18 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.